AoC Blog


Obama administration's Youth Sustainability Challenge

The Obama Administration’s Council on Environmental Quality is the latest to join the growing excitement leading up to Rio+20. Announced May 10th by EPA’s Lisa Jackson and CEQ Chair Nancy Sutley, the Obama administration is challenging America’s youth to tell the world how they are fostering sustainability and creating an America built to last. The new Youth Sustainability Challenge asks for videos from participants with a message on how they are making a difference. A panel of Administration officials will appraise the entries and the winners will be invited to the White House for a special event on sustainability leadership! We are asking you to reach out to your networks if you believe in joining the CEQ and us to make #EarthDayEveryDay. America’s youth have the power to create a better America, one built to last and to change our world for the better. Let’s join the excitement as Rio+20 approaches, and spread the world about the CEQ’s Youth Sustainability Challenge.

 On Twitter:

On Facebook:

  • The Obama Administration is challenging America’s youth to lend their voices to tell the world what they are doing in their own communities to foster sustainability and help create an America built to last. Submit your video: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sustainability-challenge

Please contact Amanda Hansen at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. if you have any questions. Thank you for your efforts to help move our country forward and create an America built to last!

Oli from the Rio+20 delegation blogs at the State Dept about the World Water Forum!

Olimar Maisonet-Guzman is a member of the SustainUS' youth delegation Rio+20.

Check out her blog post at the State Department's Climate Conversations blog, "World Youth Declaration for Water"

CSocD-50 Day Two: Reflection by Ashley Eberhart

It took me a few minutes to realize that the delegate from Thailand was touching rather than looking at the statement he was reading. With incredible dexterity, he spoke about the exclusion of disabled people from poverty eradication efforts, particularly how they tended to be “the first group to be forgotten” in Thai policymaking. His final words, “Today, I am giving up on giving up,” drew a wave of applause from a crowd that tends to transition from speaker to speaker without a sound. It was by far the most moving moment of the CSocD-50 sessions so far. By showing his personal commitment to overcoming the social adversity of disability in his home country, the delegate was a living example of the end goal of these diplomatic efforts.

In the large general sessions that occur daily here at the United Nations, delegates who wish to deliver a statement on their country’s priorities have the floor in almost rapid succession. Many of these statements are fairly vague, some brimming with platitudes that generally agree that poverty is inherently a bad thing. However, what is interesting to see how, like country-specific social issues manifest themselves through their national CSocD-50 priorities. For example, with its declining birth rate and rising proportion of aging citizens, the delegate from Japan emphasized elderly access to social services. Many representatives from African nations, whose population balance has tipped toward younger populations as the older generation is ravaged by HIV/AIDS, focus on the importance of youth empowerment. Romania, lamenting that “young people are studying abroad, and they never come back,” also noted the role of youth as “our top priority.”

In these large sessions, it becomes clear that, while the goal of eradicating poverty is shared by every member of the commission, the objectives deemed necessary to prioritize vary from delegate to delegate. The practical manifestations of poverty are not distributed evenly among nations, and as such a global mandate for governments to improve social development efforts will not look the same in every region. Somewhat like the delegates at the conference themselves, a world “solution” to poverty will come instead in many different colors, cultures, approaches, and personalities.